A Review Of trade secret case law
A Review Of trade secret case law
Blog Article
9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to the offender plus the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution may be justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears and a new system is set in its place.
In addition, it addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and 120 of the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
The loads of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made very clear that police is free to just take action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. If the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and they shall be assigned non-industry duties from the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
As a result, get more info the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has got to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this sort of an appeal hasn't nonetheless been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may then seek out further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Whilst there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds little sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent in the home state, relevant case legislation from another state might be considered with the court.
PLR is usually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Several judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in positioning the Petitioner's name to the ECL based within the criminal case are inconsistent with founded legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed Read more
The DCFS social worker in charge on the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty day period report into the court, the worker elaborated within the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
500,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) Every and the same shall be saved inside the police station into the effect that no harm shall be caused to your petitioners. 5. In view of the above mentioned, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section 20 on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does deliver for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set through the government.
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to your tradition that the reader should be capable of deduce the logic from the decision and the statutes.[4]
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage is not really complete, but this is a superb starting point. See Background section at bottom of RECAP website for more information.